EVs are equivalent to paying 17.33 $ a gallon for gasoline, Gay!

IMG_4511.jpeg

You are not saving the environment by driving an electric car. You are actually ruining the environment and spending the equivalent of $17.33 per gallon of gasoline to charge it.
Fake & Gay
 

Mahdeek

Well-known member
I’m all for stopping the funding to the Saudi Royal family, but not like this. Hopefully somebody out there way more intelligent than me can figure out a way. Once the world mineral wealth is depleted and there are no viable alternatives, shit is going to hit the solar powered fan.
 
@Mahdeek maybe the following is not a "real" alternative, but I found that very impressive when I saw it many years ago. I stumbled over it during the Deepwater Horizon incident and aftermaths.

 

sxng9

Trustee
I don't own an EV, but at the same time, I don't care about the cost of charging the car (as long as it's not too expensive). The biggest issue with EV's for me, is that it takes a long time to charge up the car.
 

DJ StoopNig

The Honorable Reverend Doctor DJ StoopNig, Esquire
Staff member
Well, there is hydrogen powered.. but those are still electric based. And of course a few people throughout the ages have made water powered engines, but they all got "mysteriously" vanished, totally not by auto or petroleum industry goons...

Check this out:

They're working on this as well:
 

Jenkem Jenkins

Well-known member
Check this out:

They're working on this as well:
That's wild. I'd heard of the Toyota Mirai being the first mass produced hydrogen powered car (and pretty damn cheap for what it is) but I had no idea it had been taken to the supercar level.

As for the ammonia engine, I'm kinda surprised but not really. Most people think internal combustion when they think of an engine, and that means anything combustible can be used in an engine with enough modifications. A lot of the city owned vehicles where I live run on propane. Most garbage trucks run off LP gas, forklifts too. I've seen Russians modify old Ladas to run off vodka (not very smoothly), I've seen go-kart projects run off butane, pentane, even kerosene. Give it a hundred years and vehicles will have little nuclear reactors in them like the Ford Nucleon..
 

DePlasmatikon Gibs

Jr. Administration
Staff member
The biggest issue with EV's for me, is that it takes a long time to charge up the car.
Yes, and it's inversely proportional to the time it takes to drain it. :lol: Which deteriorates every year until you're frustrated enough to buy an expensive replacement.

Most of our customers charge at home and are very happy with their EV's.
They must be wealthy because if everyone is so eager to get them, why do governments worldwide have to force EVs on people by laws, quotas and combustion engine bans?

EVs are expensive and will make the freedom of travel unaffordable to a considerable part of the population which is exactly what the globalists want. Stay in your pod and eat bugs while the elite enjoys unlimited travel on private jets. Covid lockdowns were a compliance test. There were massive travel restrictions for the common folk and exceptions for "VIPs".

"Do as we say, not as we do!"
 
G

Greasemonkey

Guest
Hydrogen is probably the way go my godmother runs a Hydrogen powdered car in California and likes it but it takes a heck of a lot of electricity to make Hydrogen. We converted a 1956 Austin Champ to EV for me to run around the Isle of Mull and it cost nothing to recharge because we live off the grid and had our own solar panels and wind generator, we also have a backup generator that runs on kerosene and old oil even cooking oil. We sold the Champ to a friend before we left.
 

Niggers are apes

Well-known member
EV's have an additional selling point. When/if the power goes down the EV battery can be used to power your house. Since solar power can be produced at very low cost technically the EV batteries can be dual purposed. Most cars are parked 90% of the time so all the cars not being driven can be used to reverse charge the grid allowing us to switch entirely to renewable power.
 
EV's have an additional selling point. When/if the power goes down the EV battery can be used to power your house. Since solar power can be produced at very low cost technically the EV batteries can be dual purposed. Most cars are parked 90% of the time so all the cars not being driven can be used to reverse charge the grid allowing us to switch entirely to renewable power.

Yes but you still have a rate of 4:1 to 16:1 for recharging the battery, and when it flows back into the grid there's a little loss again. You always put a multiple in of what you get out. You can't drive your car during that time. In case of (pre-planned) blackouts the gov may requisition your car because there's an "energy emergency", the non-EV's get confiscated in parallel because of the "climate emergency". lulz. Then you can wait until the batteries are empty, the social credit, anti-racism & surveillance systems will be the last to be shutdown.
 
Top