The predatory savages among us, and what to do about them

[Capt. Larsen]

The predatory savages among us, and what to do about them

John of Powerline notes the savage attack by a gang of blacks on a white man outside an amusement park in the Twin Cities. Even the ultra-liberal Star Tribune can't conceal the racial status of the attackers, who employed the standard black method of assault:

Eight young men are accused of taking turns stomping on and kicking the head of the 41-year-old man, who was knocked unconscious as his wife and three daughters tried to help him. Prosecutors say more serious charges could be brought against the men if the man's injuries are permanent.

It's not definite from the Star-Tribune's story what the race of the victim is. The victim's wife's comment about the thugs "I never seen them a day before in my life," seems more likely to come from a black person than a white person. But Scott of Powerline in a follow-up entry says the victim and his family are white. And since he writes from the Twin Cities, and since the Powerline guys are the farthest thing from racial rabble-rousers, I take his word for it.

One could easily devote an entire website just to the ongoing savage violent crimes by blacks against whites in this country, several of which VFR has reported on recently.

Our society, particularly whites, must publicly and explicitly recognize that young black men are dangerous to whites, and start acting accordingly. That means complete public frankness about black violence and particularly black-on-white violence; it means acknowledging that white people's desire to avoid blacks is not "racist," i.e., immoral; it means acceptance of natural residential racial segregation; it means race-specific policing, and much more.

However, apart from the racial dimension of the problem which must be faced and dealt with, it is imperative that conservatives bring back to center stage the necessity of marriage and the presence of a father in a boy's life--the issue that George W. Bush relegated to the sideline of conservatism in 2000 when he ran on the slogan that "single moms" have "the toughest job in America," and are deserving of special respect and special help. Due to Bush's maleficent influence, conservatives dropped opposition to illegitimacy as one of their key concerns. That must be reversed. A society of people born and raised outside of wedlock is a society of dysfunctional and criminal people--a reality that is not limited to blacks, as Simon Heffer's story in the Telegraph about the horrific social conditions in East Glasgow makes clear.

However, to revive the common understanding and expectation that childbirth must take place within marriage, society must raise the respect for marriage, which can't be done when the popular media of the West continuously legitimize and glorify illegitimate births, as, for example, the New York Post did when Britney Spears's 16 year old sister had a child. In a West that wants to survive, celebrities who have children outside of marriage, such as Angelina Jolie, will be condemned and shunned, not treated as gods.

The revival of the ethos that childbirth belongs within marriage also cannot take place while society is in the midst of surrendering to the legalization of same-sex "marriage." Homosexual "marriage" radically devalues marriage, first, by de-linking marriage from the natural conception of children, and second, by eliminating the very concepts of husband, wife, father, mother. Since, under a same-sex marriage regime, these natural, sex-specific terms exclude same-sex couples, they must be replaced by such generic terms as "partner" and "parent." Furthermore, young men's willingness to give up their freedom for marriage requires that the married state convey a special quality of honor to them. That promise of honor is destroyed when marriage includes homosexual "marriage," and young men contemplating marriage realize that instead of becoming a husband, they will become a "partner," the moral equivalent of a homosexual man or a lesbian.

Therefore, tying the above together, if we are serious about arresting the slippage of Western countries into savagery, we must defeat the movement to institutionalize same-sex marriage, and the only way to do that in the U.S. is through the Federal Marriage Amendment.

Everything is connected to everything else. Only the return of traditional morality can save us.

- end of initial entry -

[M4-CARBINE]

You simply get your concealed carry permit. Traditionally how did we control savages?...... We always controlled them with firearms, because they do not have the ability to reason and be civil about anything.

[AG]

2 words: FENCES AND FIREARMS.

[Kitty]

You simply get your concealed carry permit. Traditionally how did we control savages?...... We always controlled them with firearms, because they do not have the ability to reason and be civil about anything.

Amen, brother..well said!!

[ChicagoAvenger]

"You simply get your concealed carry permit."

Unless you live in IL or WI.
Then you pack anyway!

The niggers are!

[zookeeper]

Great post, Captain! Many good points covered identifying the intentions of the enemies of the West.