You know, I'm not a fucking alarmist, not even in the least. But I am a realist.
This shit stinks to high heaven.
Here's the latest. SCOTUS denied the stay yesterday in Berg v Obama. But did NOT dismiss the case.
www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm">http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm
The big story was in Williamson County Texas, today. My old stomping grounds. But the court blew them off, telling them that as American citizens, we have no standing. No right to know.
Seems to me this is exactly what started a revolution in this country some 230 plus years ago.
Dr Orly Taitz flew into Texas today, and has more at her blog. Her case, Lightfoot v Bowen is in conference tomorrow at SCOTUS.
But the good news is, the supplemental brief was added and distributed to the justices!
This Supplemental Brief contains a copy of the legal action by Attorney Orly Taitz that was filed on behalf of Ambassador Dr. Allen Keyes, Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson in the Federal Court, Central District of Santa Ana, California. It is a legal action challenging the legitimacy of the Presidency of Barack Obama under the Executive Order issued by President Bush on January 16th. This action is seeking the mandate for the US State Department, the FBI and the Director of the Personnel Department to seek the documents for verifying Obama's legitimacy as President and also his citizenship of the United States.
Check out her blog, it is chock full of information. But this is something that REALLY sticks out:
"Orly had to explain to Mr. Bickell when he called her how we citizens got concerned when we saw the information about the cases we have all supported, worked on, and followed disappear from the docket.
Orly also had to explain to Mr. Bickell that many of us citizens are also concerned about the 8 out of 9 justices meeting privately with Mr. Obama. No reporters were allowed. No attorneys were invited on behalf of the Plaintiffs. This causes many of us citizens to question the rules of judicial ethics and causes us to question the impartiality on behalf of the justices.
Quite a number of people have contacted their senators and congressmen because of this meeting and want the justices impeached because the plaintiffs and attorneys weren't present."
Shocking, huh?
http://drorly.blogspot.com/
I think we may be witnessing a coup d’état here.
I'm not an alarmist, But knowing that the Justices are meeting privately with Obama without any of the plaintiff's lawyers present, is quite troubling. I would love to know who the one holdout judge was.
Now is a really good time to become vigilant and aware. THIS is why the founding fathers drafted the Second Amendment.
.



Reply With Quote

