Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1

    Default WTF?! Bald-headed sheboon on Enterprise bridge! LOL!

    Just got back from the new Star Trek movie. What the hell was the casting department putting an obese, bald-headed sheboon on the bridge of the Enterprise! LMAO.. Also, what's the deal with this new Uhura? The old one primarily sat at the chair. They find a 'skinny', 'articulate' boon for the new Uhura in a lame attempt to try to portray negresses as anything other what we get in real life: loud, fat, and disgusting. Sheesus!

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by acrovader View Post
    Just got back from the new Star Trek movie. What the hell was the casting department putting an obese, bald-headed sheboon on the bridge of the Enterprise! LMAO.. Also, what's the deal with this new Uhura? The old one primarily sat at the chair. They find a 'skinny', 'articulate' boon for the new Uhura in a lame attempt to try to portray negresses as anything other what we get in real life: loud, fat, and disgusting. Sheesus!
    Other than that, how was it? I won't be able to go till tomorrow afternoon.
    Not so long ago, and not too far away.



    The true soiling of Old Glory




    Keep it up, niggers!!

  3. #3

    Default

    I liked it, despite not being much of a fan of Star Trek. It's a lot different from the vision Gene Roddenberry had in mind. I don't like this 'new' Kahn, the original one was so MUCH better. I expected to see more of the Klingons, but they play a small role. They should've been the central villains. There are some plot holes. And the ending was a cheat.

  4. #4

    Default

    I just read a spoiler about it. Blasphemy I say!!! It was previously leaked that Sherlock would NOT be Kahn. Vert Da Furk!!

    Shooga, Ducat?? What say you?
    Not so long ago, and not too far away.



    The true soiling of Old Glory




    Keep it up, niggers!!

  5. #5

    Default

    He originally goes by John Harrison. Then later on he's revealed to be Kahn.

  6. #6

    Default

    Not for nothing, but this is NOT the type of actor I would have imagined would get the role. I am at a loss. As I have yet to see the movie...going Saturday...maybe he fits in what in reality is the single most iconic figure other than Kirk and Spock as far as Star Trek goes. Those are big shoes to fill.

    All I can say is I better be fucking pleased.

    And no matter who was cast at least they did not put a nigger in the role, which I had been dreading would happen.

    I will have to wait and see.
    My wonderful Dad taught me a valuable lesson as a young man.

    "Son", he said, "I am not prejudiced".
    "I believe every white person should own one"


  7. #7

    Default

    I haven't seen the new film yet, I don't have the time right now. I always liked some of the TOS and TNG films (Undiscovered Country, First Contact, Generations). I personally don't understand this whole alternate universe thing. Throughout the other series' there were various temporal agents and organizations keeping a watch on the timeline, ensuring events would and would not happen. Then all of the sudden, bam! Romulus and Vulcan become red shirt planets and a new timeline is created. JJ Abrams does not have Roddenberry's vision.

    I've always watched star trek, (I've always wondered what is out there), but could never stand some of the fans. The ones who wear the starfleet uniforms to their day to day jobs are the worst.

    Star trek has always put token black characters in the series, they want to portray blacks as capable people being able to run a starship, yet we've seen the Ugandan and Congo space programs a lot here. Isn't it a bit odd, that in DS9, Avery Brooks was chosen to portray Sisko, just after the LA riots? Look up the dates.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mushmouth View Post
    I just read a spoiler about it. Blasphemy I say!!! It was previously leaked that Sherlock would NOT be Kahn. Vert Da Furk!!

    Shooga, Ducat?? What say you?
    Benicio Del Toro was supposed to play Kahn. I think he would have been a better Kahn than Ricardo Montelban even. But alas, Benicio is very finicky and he and the director had 'artistic agreements', aka Benicio wasn't getting paid enough money or given enough leeway in how he wanted to portray his character so he walked away
    Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace. -- James Madison

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gul Dukat View Post
    I haven't seen the new film yet, I don't have the time right now. I always liked some of the TOS and TNG films (Undiscovered Country, First Contact, Generations). I personally don't understand this whole alternate universe thing. Throughout the other series' there were various temporal agents and organizations keeping a watch on the timeline, ensuring events would and would not happen. Then all of the sudden, bam! Romulus and Vulcan become red shirt planets and a new timeline is created. JJ Abrams does not have Roddenberry's vision.

    I've always watched star trek, (I've always wondered what is out there), but could never stand some of the fans. The ones who wear the starfleet uniforms to their day to day jobs are the worst.

    Star trek has always put token black characters in the series, they want to portray blacks as capable people being able to run a starship, yet we've seen the Ugandan and Congo space programs a lot here. Isn't it a bit odd, that in DS9, Avery Brooks was chosen to portray Sisko, just after the LA riots? Look up the dates.
    The Department of Temporal Investigations didn't show up until midway through DS9, with the Tribbles episode. They may not have existed during the TNG years. In fact, perhaps it was the events of "Time's Arrow" that prompted the Federation to create the department in the first place, or more likely, "Past Tense" where Sisko royally mucked around with history. If Star Trek ever had a niggerloving episode, that was it. A bunch of YT rioters are about to kill hostages, and it's a noble, homeless nigger who sacrifices his life to save them.

    I don't care for the destruction of Vulcan, either. As a plot device, I suppose since it's a new alternate reality, fine. But it was bad science, for one, because the effects didn't seem like a subspace shockwave, so a supernova's regular Newtonian effects would have taken a very long time to reach Vulcan. And Spock miscalculated the supernova's speed?!

  10. #10

    Default

    I tried watching a shitty bootleg copy and turned it off at about the 7:10 mark because there was a nasty-ass coalburner scene. Nope, not Urhura & Spock but a different "couple". I'm certainly not a Trekkie (weirdo's) but I do enjoy a good movie and thought the 2009 one to be pretty damn good. I was hoping this one would follow suit. Naw, I'll wait for the DVD and maybe watch it then. C'mon Abrams....coalburning seven minutes in FFS?

    Takie.jpg
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. George Orwell....

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Chimpout.com vBulletin skin by CompletevB.com.