"White prof finds he's not"-UPI.com

[cz-H82]

So theres a story on UPI I found on Reddit and apparently most whites are black? I'm kinda confused and worried so I figured I'd bring this story to light so you can share your facts and opinions. Not entirely sure how the whole link thing works but I did my best. I find it strange that no matter what science is periodically being used to try and show that there are no differences between us and the blacks. It isn't enough to simply walk outside, read a newspaper, or look online and see that the possibility of us being the same species is nil. I come from a Polish and French/German background it upsets me when these stories come out cus I worry. I read somewhere you can get a test to see where your ancestors originated from. I am wondering where I can find one of those tests and I hope the only thing I could be other than white is Mongolian. Sorry if my link is posted incorrectly.


http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2002/05/...3561020909970/

[cat_fur_allergic]

alot of blacks in the past pass for white.

[NiggerRich]

I don't mean for this to be spam, but you can join ancestry.com and have your DNA analyzed for about $200.

Here's my results:



It seems to be accurate. As far as I have traced my lineage, back two centuries, it's almost all British (including Scots-Irish) and French.

[NotThatGuy]

Is it me or does this story sound fishy? Some liberal professor just happens to discover that he is 22% black, yet no one in his family remembers any Mammy's in the family tree?

As for me, I can go to my Dad's and get the family bible and trace my lineage back over 500 years. I can guarantee you that there isn't a single "D'Vante" or "Shaniqua" in there.

[Justin Igger]

It's just more liberal lies.

Coal burning and oil drilling were very rare in the past and any bastard mix was sent to live with the niggers where that White DNA was remixed back into the black.

A mullato living in white society was treated like a nigger and were not allowed to cavort with or marry a white.

Unless you can link to a direct nigger ancestor, it is very unlikely that you carry african genes.

[Shoogafoot Jones]

All four of my Grandparents were born in Ireland between 1902 and 1911. There is no fucking way there is any nigger blood flowing through these veins.

If the UPI dick wants to pass himself off as 22% nigger, then he should just call a spade a spade and admit he is a NIGGER. All it does take is "one drop" and you beez a nigger. Only a nigger would write an article like this despite what it may look like in a mirror.

I really hate these liars.

[ambition_def]

Is it me or does this story sound fishy? Some liberal professor just happens to discover that he is 22% black, yet no one in his family remembers any Mammy's in the family tree?

As for me, I can go to my Dad's and get the family bible and trace my lineage back over 500 years. I can guarantee you that there isn't a single "D'Vante" or "Shaniqua" in there.

The hypothesis is that somewhere in Pennsylvania during the abolitionist movement a one dropper fucked his ancestor. Seems very unlikely but could have been possible. For example if he/she was very homely.

It does however show that if true, it takes a very large amount of white blood to stamp out the nigger gene. While we do not know the liberal doctor in question it could be possible that even with blue eyes and pale skin he experiences episodes of TNB.

He readily admits that most blacks have very little white blood. Hence why they are still closer to prototypical humans than the advanced social human Eurasians became.

So assuming if true, all nigger blood would have to be diluted to about 2/10ths.


Also, I don't see the point in saying that we're more alike than we are different. That little DNA chestnut could be spoken of regarding dogs and wolves too. Clearly it is the difference that becomes important to society, survival and risk assessment.

[cat_fur_allergic]

if you want a good dna test get this one:


99 dollar spit and tells you were your mothers mothers and fathers father actually come from and gives you tons of other dna data on tons of stuff from height to medical etc..

https://www.23andme.com/


An estimated 2.5% of your DNA is from Neanderthals.

lol I'm not african for sure .


Neanderthals were a group of humans who lived in Europe and Western Asia. They are the closest evolutionary relatives of modern humans, but they went extinct about 30,000 years ago. The first Neanderthals arrived in Europe as early as 600,000 to 350,000 years ago. Neanderthals — Homo neanderthalensis — and modern humans — Homo sapiens — lived along side each other for thousands of years. Genetic evidence suggest that they interbred and although Neanderthals disappeared about 30,000 years ago, traces of their DNA — between 1 percent and 4 percent — are found in all modern humans outside of Africa. Apart from the curiosity of finding what percentage of a modern human's genome is Neanderthal, the information has great value for science. By comparing our DNA with Neanderthal DNA, scientists can detect the most recent evolutionary changes as we developed into fully modern humans.

these things are all true and site has the same info lol.

Alcohol Flush Reaction Does Not Flush
Bitter Taste Perception Can Taste

Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency Variant Absent
Bloom's Syndrome Variant Absent
BRCA Cancer Mutations (Selected) Variant Absent
Canavan Disease Variant Absent
Cystic Fibrosis Variant Absent

alot of info like this from the test besides your ancestry.

[NiggerRich]

if you want a good dna test get this one:


99 dollar spit and tells you were your mothers mothers and fathers father actually come from and gives you tons of other dna data on tons of stuff from height to medical etc..

https://www.23andme.com/

That sounds way cooler than ancestry.com's. I'd love to know how much Neanderthal "blood" I have!

[rope_therapy]

Please keep in mind from a modern scientific stand point that Darwin's theory of evolution is incorrect and was proven so in his life time.

Dominant and recessive genes were alien to the consideration when forming the theory and poor Darwin had by modern standards some quite insane ideas on ducks breeding with otters to make a platypus.

It all relies on missing link evidence as proof and an enormous leap of faith that blending determines the characteristics of the off spring.

Gregor Mendel proved Darwin's blending was incorrect with his experiment involving black and white peas. He determined that dominant black peas could have a recessive white pea as off spring if the black pea has a white pea ancestor.

Just this understanding alone is enough to debunk 90% of Darwin's work.

Nobody yet has proven any animal evolved from another and as understanding increases it appears less likely.

As for Neanderthals breeding with homosapiens this is also extremely unlikely and if possible would disprove humans evolved to a different species and instead were just deformed Neanderthals.

Teaching Darwin's theory today as fact is retarded but to leave it out would be equally retarded as science is a work in progress and past inaccuracies are a trail towards future understanding.

Sent from my HTC (Hate The Coons) Desire using kaffatalk 2