Chimpout.Com-A view from the outside

[Neiio]

This is a common method used to win a conversation. They attack our view of the world by picking what they believe to be false in their diluted liberal minds whilst not attempting to give any evidence against it. How pathetic that many believe that this kind of sugar coated crap is 'intelligent' only because it's PC. The masses have always been delusional, and now more so than ever. That's why I have always thought for myself and believed what I see and not what I've been told. We must continue our struggle against this liberal propaganda and hope that we gain control of the masses in the future.

[I din du nuffin]

Adam and Eve are fictional characters out of a primitive book.

There is nothing intelligent about "intelligent design." It is a misnomer created by anti-intellectuals motivated by religious ignorance.

Money does not promote faking fossils. It does promote willful religious ignorance and the anti-science that goes with it.

The truth is not "somewhere in the middle." The ignorance promoted by religious myth is 100% bullshit.

We have DNA proving both genetic distance between species and shared ancestry. We have mitochondrial DNA. We have the fossil record.

Denying evolution is tantamount to admitting niggers are the same as humans.

What you are talking about doesn't rule out design. We are made up of matter that other beings (and even fruit) are made up of. Retro genes could either be signs that we are direct descendants, or that we are a combination of them through intelligent design. The old saying about Adam and Eve doesn't get rubbed out here either. If Adam was made from earth and Eve from Adam, it could clearly be a part of this intelligent design.

DNA is not this all encompassing identity factor. DNA by at least 50% is shared across all living things on the planet and breaks down to simple functions of acids and proteins. Even when DNA is extremely close, such as chimpanzee and man, the differences are massive.

Mind, I am not bashing evolution. Like stated I believe we evolved to be what we are and that is worlds apart from what is called African today. But the plasticity factor is what is argued. Could we have evolved from a vegetable prototype to a human being? That is the area where theory starts to become comedy. Yes, even considering hundreds of millions of years. There is hardly any proof of transitional fossils to begin with. The majority of transitional fossils that exist today are more fiction than fact. They even say this in many of their lessons and videos. They come into the study of a new fossil with a preconception about what a transitional fossil would look like and then they start making forms out of thin air. Reconnecting the missing pieces of a fossil to make what they intended to make. Need a fish with more hands than fins? No problem when grant money is involved.

Often truth is somewhere in the middle. We are plastic no doubt. We'd have to be to be able to adapt. I mean in physiological and psychological terms here. To what extent we are plastic is really not known too well.

[Coon Tasty]

There is nothing intelligent about "intelligent design." It is a misnomer created by anti-intellectuals motivated by religious ignorance.

^^ An incredibly ignorant statement by itself.

[Neiio]

^^ An incredibly ignorant statement by itself.

lol made me laugh, I'm an atheist but we should'nt be arguing if god exists or not. Remember we are here to bash on niggers.

[CoonTownYT]

I'm agnostic myself, but we do not openly discuss the vices and virtues of any religion or lack thereof here on CO. That's one of the main rules of this forum.

This thread has devolved from an intelligent discussion to bashing religion. It will not be tolerated.

Thread closed.