homo erectus walks amongst us : Black on White Crime

[White]

There is so much more black-against-white crime than white-against-black crime (Figure 12-2), despite blacks having more contact with other blacks and blacks constituting a smaller percentage of the population, that it is clear that blacks are targeting whites. (“In 2005, there were more than 645,000 victims of cross-racial violent crimes between blacks and whites in the U.S. In 90 percent of those crimes, black offenders attacked white victims.” (Witt, H., Chicago Tribune, “What Is a Hate Crime?” Aug. 24, 2007). Black leader Jesse Jackson admitted that when he worked as a waiter in a Greenville, South Carolina hotel he spat into the soups and salads of white customers. (Pekkanen, J., "Jesse Jackson? Black Hope, White Hope: His Style is Militant but Nonviolent," Life Magazine, Nov. 21, 1969, p. 67). Blacks also target cops. From 1994 to 2005, 40% of the cop killers were black. (MacDonald, H. “Cop Killers in High Places,” Front Page Magazine, July 23, 2007). Back)



Between 1964 and 1994 there were over 25 million violent interracial crimes, overwhelmingly black offenders and white victims. (Justice Department and FBI statistics). “Black Americans have committed at least 170 million crimes against white Americans in the past 30 years.

Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks,” and are “an estimated 39 times more likely to commit violent crime against a white person than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery,” despite whites doing their best to stay away from blacks.

“white flight.” In Figure 12-3, the probability (“Φ,” left vertical axis) that a white is violently victimized within a year increases exponentially as the proportion of blacks in a neighborhood increases, i.e., blacks target whites as soon as they start to outnumber whites



The right vertical axis gives the number of times a white person’s risk of being violently victimized increases over what it would have been had the neighborhood remained all white. Note that if blacks were not targeting whites, the blue curve in Figure 12-3 would be a straight diagonal line from the lower left to the upper right and, if the black crime rate was also the same as the white crime rate, the blue line would a straight horizontal line that coincided with the red line. “ … houses in districts with mostly white and Asian students often sell for tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars more than in districts populated mostly by black and Hispanic students.

Black rap “music” and black leaders encourage blacks to commit crimes against whites. At least one prominent black leader, Khallid Muhammad (a personal assistant of Louis Farrakhan and an event organizer with Al Sharpton), has openly called for blacks to kill whites, even women and babies.
Not only is the black-on-white crime rate much higher than the white-on-black crime rate, but it differs from white crime in that it is more impulsive, more savage, and often involves more attackers, (Another difference: during natural disasters and the collapse of civil authority, whites tend to come together to help each other; blacks see it as an opportunity for looting and rape)

Examples, typically ignored by the mass media, include the December, 2000, “Wichita Massacre,” where the Carr brothers raped, sodomized, and murdered five young whites (three men and two women), and the January, 2007, Knoxville, Tennessee, torture, sexual mutilations, rapes, and murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom – five blacks, including one female, were charged

                            Rape
African men have a high crime rate for rape, regardless of what country they are in. There is little punishment for rape in Africa and therefore, it would be maladaptive not to rape. It is a good reproductive strategy for a male who is unable to obtain a female any other way. 66
In a 2005 survey on “rape and sexual assault” in the United States, 67 37,460 white women were victims of blacks, but white-on-black rape was too low to show up in the statistics. “What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.”

[White]

A few comments on these items:
Item 3. Although there is currently a mania of tattooing and body piercing sweeping US youth, this is not considered “severe” mutilation or deformation of the body and is, hopefully, a phase that will quickly pass.
Item 4. African huts were built with vegetation and mud, never more than one story.
Item 7. Domesticating animals requires not only foregoing the instant gratification of eating them, but also caring for them until they have reproduced. Even then, one must plan still farther ahead by eating only the worst animals, saving the best for reproduction. Such long-term planning is not characteristic of Africans. (Chap. 12).
Item 9. Africans had no wheeled vehicles or devises that employed a wheel, not even a compass.
Item 10. Africans never rose above a barter system.
Item 13. This should be interpreted as open, publicly-accepted torture against common people, and not during a war.
Item 14. Again, this means openly killing people in order to eat them.
Item 15. On January 9, 2001 a lunar eclipse caused rioting in Nigeria; evil people were blamed. (“Eclipse Triggers Nigeria Riot,” BBC News, Jan. 10, 2001). Children have been banned by their own parents in the belief that they are witches. (“DR Congo’s Unhappy Child ‘Witches’,” BBC News, Jan. 13, 2003). Albinos are killed for their body parts, which are used in witchcraft. ("Living in Fear: Tanzania's Albinos," BBC News, July 21, 2008). "Police in Congo have arrested suspected sorcerers accused of using black magic to steal or shrink men's private parts. There has been a wave of panic and attempted lynchings triggered by the alleged witchcraft." (The Case of the Penis Snatchers, Now Public, Apr. 23, 2008).
Item 16. Writing arose independently in at least three places: Mesopotamia, China, and Mesoamerica, and probably also Egypt and India, but did not spread to sub-Saharan Africa.
Item 18. Africans lacked even a sun dial for determining the time of day.


Figure 15-2 Figure 15-3

Now compare Stonehenge with another stone structure, Great Zimbabwe (Fig. 15-3), the largest ruins in sub-Saharan Africa. It consists of plain stone block walls without mortar and dates to less than 1000 ya, about 3300 yrs after Stonehenge was built and long after non-Africans had arrived.

Although Africans probably supplied the labor, it is doubtful that they designed it or instigated its construction as it is not representative of any past Zimbabwean culture or architectural tradition, and Africans do not make use of stone construction. It may have been built by Islamic slave traders as a fortress and slave holding area or as a storage area for goods to be shipped out of Africa.

The most advanced civilizations have been created by whites and East Asians. Perhaps the reader believes that the failure of Africans to create civilizations in the past is not due to genes, but to an environment that was not encountered by Caucasians and Asians. It does seem that not only does intelligence increase with distance away from the tropics, but so does civilization. Southern Asia is also tropical and its people also have a lower level of both intelligence and civilization, but not nearly as low as in Africa.

Africa is a huge and diverse continent, with the southern tip having a temperate climate. If there were something unique about the continent itself that prevented the creation of civilizations, then one would expect blacks living elsewhere, such as in Haiti 8 or Detroit, 9 to build civilizations, but instead they have destroyed the civilizations that whites had already built there. Figure 15-4 shows the second floor of the Detroit Public Schools Book Depository, 10 where thousands of books have been destroyed.



Figure 15-4
“[T]hey [Africans] will destroy and devour him [whites] and they will destroy all his work.” (Albert Schweitzer)

One might expect that whites who immigrated to Africa to also fail at building successful civilizations on that continent, but instead they built first world countries; those countries, now taken over by Africans, are descending into chaos. Rhodesia, as it was called when run by whites, was the breadbasket of Africa and exported grain; Zimbabwe, as it was renamed after Africans took over, cannot feed even half its own people.

Even Liberia, founded by repatriated American slaves, is dissolving into chaos and cannibalism, despite the infusion of African Americans who had lived in a white country.

If Africans were even capable of keeping a white-created civilization going, one would expect them to be much better off when Apartheid and the economic boycotts of South Africa ended in 1994 and the reins of this first world country were turned over to them.

But the National Bureau of Economic Research found that the average income of all races in South Africa dropped 40% between 1995 and 2000. The UN 2006 Human Development Report found that over the last 3 decades Africa has had a “virtual reversal” of human development; South Africa dropped 38 places on the Human Development Index since 1994. (UN Development Programme, 2007).

The country of the world’s first heart transplant (Christian Barnard, Dec., 1967), the Union of South Africa, is now the rape 13 and murder 14 capital of the world. The deterioration of South Africa since the end of Apartheid refutes egalitarianism.

No country ruled by blacks has escaped self-inflicted devastation; it is fair to conclude that blacks are incapable of achieving or maintaining a modern civilization when left to themselves. 17 Figure 15-5 shows the Grande Hotel in Beira, Mozambique in 1975, when the country became independent of white rule.



Figure 15-5



Figure 15-6 shows the same hotel in 2007, after 32 years of black rule.

Accomplishments :

Picture of gorilla head is from (The Sunday Telegraph, Sept. 5, 2004). Also, see (Discovery Channel News, “Silverback Gorillas Eaten By Rebels,” Jan. 18, 2007). Now that Africans have white man’s guns, these and smaller animals are disappearing. (See the powerful documentary movie, “Africa Addio.”) The bonobo chimp is being killed as bush meat, and so are many other animals that Africans could not have killed without white technology. The chimpanzee and the gorilla did get some revenge – Africans who ate them picked up the virus that causes AIDS. ("Aids started by humans eating chimps," Telegraph (England), Feb., 1999). Van Heuverswyn, 2006). Back


Blacks who do make significant contributions, or at least rise to prominence (other than in sports and entertainment), are almost always mulattos with a large percentage of white heritage. (e.g., Colin Powell, Barack Obama)

universities offer large amounts of scholarship aid to blacks. 24 All these factors give blacks a huge advantage, yet they still fail to accomplish much.
No black has ever won a Nobel Prize in any of the arts or sciences.

[treyboon]

i like the guy on top of the lightpole in the drawing.

[Lady Bastille]

Beautiful post, but I'd like to make a few points, as well.

Niggers and libtards often state that whites also practiced witchcraft, and point to the Salem Witch Trials as an example. However, both the courts and the public in Europe did not believe in witches, but there were some that believed to have magical powers, the same as psychics and paranormal hunters today. Witches in Europe were simply either people who believed they could see the future and control the weather, or they were blamed but later freed due to lack of evidence. In Europe, there were trials to see if someone was a witch.

However, in the 300 year witch hunt in Europe, only a few thousand were burned. In Africa, every week there are twice as many witch burnings. Niggers still believe witchcraft and superstition today, whereas most humans believe that to be nonsense.

In regards to tattoos, I believe a few tattoos that have a meaningful purpose are alright, but the cultural phenomenon of tramp stamps and really, really tasteless tattoos I can agree that that is mutilation.

[Gul Dukat]

I've always wondered what the ecological value of the nigger was, why is he still alive in Africa? What is his purpose to be there? Whenever I see any African town and city, there are tons of shiftless, feckless "do nothing but get drunk/ high niggers" just lounging around like baboons on a hot day. What would Africa be like without niggers and just the white man living there?

There would be a highway system connecting the north to the south and east to west and all remote areas, there would be massive agriculture and food production on the plains areas. It would be easier to procure resources without having to deal with constant jaboonery. There would be more Kruger National Parks throughout the continent and it would resemble South Africa in its white days.

[Lady Bastille]

I've always wondered what the ecological value of the nigger was, why is he still alive in Africa? What is his purpose to be there? Whenever I see any African town and city, there are tons of shiftless, feckless "do nothing but get drunk/ high niggers" just lounging around like baboons on a hot day. What would Africa be like without niggers and just the white man living there?

There would be a highway system connecting the north to the south and east to west and all remote areas, there would be massive agriculture and food production on the plains areas. It would be easier to procure resources without having to deal with constant jaboonery. There would be more Kruger National Parks throughout the continent and it would resemble South Africa in its white days.

I'm willing to bet that they're a biological accident. A species is successful because of its survival skills, but the nigger has none. Chance had a bastard baby, and that was the nigger. Even apes are more successful and more similar to humans than nigger. Apes have an established patriarchy: one is the leader and makes all the decisions. They also are very social and loving of their young, and will be respectful towards humans.

Niggers are no such thing.

[mvacanti77]

<---------------- Sums it up!

[Lady Bastille]

<---------------- Sums it up!

Lol, they didn't "invent" the stick...they simply picked it up!

[Lady Bastille]

Picture of gorilla head is from (The Sunday Telegraph, Sept. 5, 2004). Also, see (Discovery Channel News, “Silverback Gorillas Eaten By Rebels,” Jan. 18, 2007). Now that Africans have white man’s guns, these and smaller animals are disappearing. (See the powerful documentary movie, “Africa Addio.”) The bonobo chimp is being killed as bush meat, and so are many other animals that Africans could not have killed without white technology. The chimpanzee and the gorilla did get some revenge – Africans who ate them picked up the virus that causes AIDS. ("Aids started by humans eating chimps," Telegraph (England), Feb., 1999). Van Heuverswyn, 2006). Back

Don't forget elephants or rhinos. When the white man was in Africa, they wanted to study and preserve the animals. Whites have a habit for efficiency and care. When they left, the niggers had access to AK-47s and other machine guns which they use to gun down the animals...I saw a clip once where a beautiful elephant was mercilessly gunned down by an AK-47. It's gotten so bad that whites cut off the animal's tusks to save them from being killed. The black rhino is now extinct from niggers, and the white rhino is close behind.

Elephants are actually smart enough to paint and are very friendly and loving. They, like the gorillas and other higher chimps, show more emotion and intelligence than niggers. Even thinking about these beautiful creatures being gunned down by niggers is enough to make me rage. The fact that they never mention who does the killings or that it is "part of their culture" reminds me a LOT of the crimes niggers due to fellow humans. Luckily AIDS et al is there to save the day.

Blacks who do make significant contributions, or at least rise to prominence (other than in sports and entertainment), are almost always mulattos with a large percentage of white heritage. (e.g., Colin Powell, Barack Obama)

universities offer large amounts of scholarship aid to blacks. 24 All these factors give blacks a huge advantage, yet they still fail to accomplish much.
No black has ever won a Nobel Prize in any of the arts or sciences.

I have often heard that this is so because of nigger history of slavery. Yet other races that have been in the same situation have drastically improved their living conditions, and even taken over their captor's country. Not so with niggers. They just sit there and whine; it's the only thing they can do. Get a nigger into any education system and watch it be destroyed.

[White]

Hard Tissue

At birth, Africans have fewer cranial bones than Eurasians. 7 The skull bones (and other bones) in Africans (Schnitzler, 1993) and erectus are thicker and denser (higher mineral content; Ettinger, 1997; Hui, 2003; Pollitizer, 1989), even in the fetus, making them more difficult to break, which is an aid in head butting and fighting as blows to the head can easily be fatal. (Broca, 1858, cited in Rushton, 2000a, p. 106). Some anthropologists believe skulls got thicker about 1.6 to 1.8 million ya when erectus developed clubs as weapons, resulting in more cracked skulls. (Wrangham, 1996; Schulting, 2002). “Herodotus … described how easily, in comparison to an Egyptian’s skull, a Persian’s skull cracked.” (Schwartz, 1999, p. 48; Egyptians had interbred with Africans by that time.) Denser bones (and less fat) make Africans less buoyant and less capable swimmers, 8 but reduce their susceptibility to osteoporosis. Female bones are lighter than male bones.


The cranial sutures are the zigzag lines where the bones that form the skull cap join together. Less complex sutures may be due to an earlier fusion of the cranial bones.

The unclosed sutures are the proportion of the total number of intersecting sutures at the top of the skull that are permanently unclosed. Unclosed sutures permit growth of the brain. An example is the retention of the metopic suture in adult Caucasians, but not adult Africans. (Figure 9-6)



The numbers are the cephalic index, which is equal to 100 times the width of the head divided by its length. (Baker, 1974). The long, narrow skull of the Africans (dolichocephalic) loses heat the fastest and the more spherical skull of the Asians (brachycephalic) better retains heat. (Boyd, 1955). Compare these black, white, and Northeast Asian (Mongol) skulls (Figure 9-7) drawn by (Morton, 1839). The black skull is more simian as it is long and narrow. The white and Mongol skulls are rounder and about the same size, but the cheek bones flair out more on the Mongol skull. There is a correlation of 0.37 between cranial capacity and the cephalic index, i.e., the long, narrow skulls of Africans have a smaller cranial capacity. (Beals, 1984).

negroid white asian

Notice the slight saggital keel (or crest) at the top of the head in the Homo habilis skull (Figure 9-10, ) and in the picture of killer James Ealy



Some African skulls are also characterized by a “dent” (“post bregmatic depression”) in the top of the skull visible from the side. It is a primitive feature that may be tied to important changes in the growth of the brain



Simian prognathism (a protruding jaw with a recessed nose) is a very primitive trait that is characteristic of apes. A jutting jaw is needed if the teeth are large, plus it is an advantage in fighting as it permits a bigger bite and makes the eyes less vulnerable. (Howells, 1959, p. 125). One is reminded of the 1997 title fight in Los Vegas where Mike Tyson bit a piece out of the ear of WBA champ Evander Holyfield.

Figure 9-24 (Nature, Vol. 228) shows a comparison of the lower jaw (mandible) of an orangutan, a Negro, and a white. The rectangles illustrate the width and length of the jaws. The numbers are the percentages of the length to the width. When there is simian prognathism the jaw is long and narrow, as in the orangutan, and when the face is flat, as the white jaw is, the length is actually less than the width; as expected, the Negro jaw is in between the jaw of the orangutan and the jaw of the white.


Figure 9-25 shows a subtle difference between Caucasian and African jaws. Looking outward from inside the mouth, the upward-directed bone that holds the jaw in place (“ascending ramus”) shows an inward protrusion (inversion) on the ramus of the African jaw that is absent in the Caucasian jaws. There are many small racial differences like this that can be used to help determine race.


Prognathism, the absence of “facial flatness” (Hanihara, 2000), can be measured by means of the facial angle, the slope of the face from the forehead to the jaws. Figure 9-26 is by Camper, who first used the concept. In his drawings, Camper gives the facial angle as 70° for the “Negro” (i.e., Congoids); H. habilis and H. erectus also have a facial angle of about 70°. 19 An angle of 60° has been given for the Hottentots and Bushmen, and 66.6° for the Australian aborigines below the nose. (Baker, 1974, p. 281); orangutans have a facial angle of 58°. 20 Camper regarded a facial angle of 100° as the epitome of beauty (Etcoff, 1999, pp. 42-43); s-S Africans have “remarkable prognathism.” (Hanihara, 2000). Figure 9-27.


A protruding jaw is usually associated with a sloping forehead (Figures 9-9 & 9-26), which indicates a smaller prefrontal cortex, the area of the brain that handles planning, inhibition, and self control. 21 Thus, the absence of prognathism is seen as less bestial and an indication of higher intelligence. The owl, for example, with its perfectly vertical facial line, was the emblem of Athena, the goddess of wisdom. Other characteristics of the jaw can also be used to identify race.