The Difference Deniers Are At It Again

[niggerflusher]

But niggers find IQs useful when trying to avoid the death penalty

[Coon Tasty]

But niggers find IQs useful when trying to avoid the death penalty

That's a damned good point.

[Gul Dukat]

"IQ is genetic and often highly intelligent people do not breed as much as the lower-IQ ones do."

Given the technological advances of the last decade and the last century the IQ of the general population has gone down. The most brilliant people are often celibate their entire lives and never pass along their DNA and intelligence. Take Sir Isaac Newton and Nikola Tesla for example, both died virgins and left no living descendents.

There is a reason why there are poor countries in the world and why they are poor in the first place, liberals often say "colonialism this'" or "white oppression that" and "imperialistic such and such", to explain why countries are poor. In order to have a clean first rate country you need to have high IQ people running it. The higher IQ the more advanced the country is, Japan and Hong Kong both have average IQ's of 105-107.

Now take Africans, they haven't invented the wheel, let alone the microchip. In West Point Liberia, there are no boats to be seen, even though they "live" right by the ocean, no real good quality roads linking rural areas anywhere on the continent. Look at any nigger slum in Africa, there are no carts with wheels, they still carry stuff on their heads. In Liberia they are completely incapable of building proper latrines so they use the beach. In South Africa the kaffirs burned down schools, it shows they can't plan ahead more than 10 minutes and they can't link prosperity with education.

[ambition_def]

My friend and I had a conversation pertaining to this topic. She spoke of a question that her professor posed to the classroom. The teacher asked, is the population of the U.S. becoming more intellectual or decreasing in intelligence? Of course many students suggested that our intelligence overall was increasing, but others rebutted that our dependence on modern day technology decreased intelligence. However, the teacher explained that it involved IQ levels. People with incredibly high IQ levels had no children or only one child. As the IQ level decreases the number of offspring increases. Those with very low levels of intelligence tend to have five or more children. Levels of intelligence seem to pass genetically, therefor causing a large group of children to inherit their parents’ low IQs. There are either few or no offspring of bright, brainy humans to help societies excel forward into the future.

Luft and I also discussed this in PM. This is the crux of the cyclical empire. As quality of life gets better, the stupid aren't punished for being stupid and the intelligent become disinterested in liabilities. Quality of life becomes so good and studies become so complex that you could go your entire life without ever experiencing parenthood and still be occupied. I find myself to be in a similar situation being single and without children. It comes down to making time for it which I understand very well to be another liability.

Once the empire collapses, the stupid are once again mortally punished and the intelligent get on with child rearing in place of now-lost Academics / business. The cycle starts anew.

[Chalkie]

Luft and I also discussed this in PM. This is the crux of the cyclical empire. As quality of life gets better, the stupid aren't punished for being stupid and the intelligent become disinterested in liabilities. Quality of life becomes so good and studies become so complex that you could go your entire life without ever experiencing parenthood and still be occupied. I find myself to be in a similar situation being single and without children. It comes down to making time for it which I understand very well to be another liability.

Once the empire collapses, the stupid are once again mortally punished and the intelligent get on with child rearing in place of now-lost Academics / business. The cycle starts anew.

I find much truth in your words and I believe the same for the most part. I consider myself to be more intelligent than most people who comprise the communities that surround me, leaving me with a feeling like I am socially exiled. I do not think in the same manner as other people, therefor I do not behave in the same manner. Unlike most women, I have no need to be a mother, neither do I desire motherhood. Many people create their own quality of life based on surrounding environments. For some, quality of life is having children and creating a family. For others, it is dedication to complex studies or traveling around. For niggers, it is rape, petty theft, malt liquor, and Kools. When environments change, Social Darwinism begins to kick-in and animals/people adapt to survive, in turn changing the desired quality of life. Usually powerful and great empires collapse around the 200 hundred-year marker, creating drastic changes to their populace and the systematic ways used to control said populace. The most mentally and physically fit will be the ones to push through and rebuild society, almost like putting together dinosaur fossils to recreate an actual pre-historic creature. Those who are not fit will die off along with the empire they belonged to. It is true that when such a fall occurs the intelligent will reproduce, but the days will not be filled with consensual, hard-core and steamy sex, though that does sound incredibly pleasurable. Instead, it will be devoted to hard and long days filled with development/construction and since academics and businesses will be lost, there will be a mandatory need to replace these valued essentials. The most prestigious of our species will be the ones to complete the steps required for replacing our lost ways of life. I often think about changing my degree to architecture due to the fact that when the end of the world comes, if a shred of society is left, there will be three work-forces still in effect. The first is medical professions or those who pertain such knowledge, which will always be needed and around. The second being government or a sense of law/police, because someone will always rise to lead/control a group of people. Humans are susceptible to power-hungry frames of mind. The third would be my area of study, development. When our world remains in ruins, humans will persevere to reconstruct the closest thing to a utopia that will accommodate any and all necessities. You are totally right when you say the cycle will repeat, however. If there is one thing I have taken away from my Social-Studies classes it is that history will repeat itself. That is why it is necessary to study history. I believe that our society should come to an end. I shall survive because I am quite a ruthless little lady. The idea of being surrounded by like-minded people is what I personal consider to be “quality of life”. Something that is hard for me to reach. Luckily, I have you guys over here at Chimpout to keep me sane and alert!

[ambition_def]

I find much truth in your words and I believe the same for the most part. I consider myself to be more intelligent than most people who comprise the communities that surround me, leaving me with a feeling like I am socially exiled. I do not think in the same manner as other people, therefor I do not behave in the same manner. Unlike most women, I have no need to be a mother, neither do I desire motherhood. Many people create their own quality of life based on surrounding environments. For some, quality of life is having children and creating a family. For others, it is dedication to complex studies or traveling around. For niggers, it is rape, petty theft, malt liquor, and Kools. When environments change, Social Darwinism begins to kick-in and animals/people adapt to survive, in turn changing the desired quality of life. Usually powerful and great empires collapse around the 200 hundred-year marker, creating drastic changes to their populace and the systematic ways used to control said populace. The most mentally and physically fit will be the ones to push through and rebuild society, almost like putting together dinosaur fossils to recreate an actual pre-historic creature. Those who are not fit will die off along with the empire they belonged to. It is true that when such a fall occurs the intelligent will reproduce, but the days will not be filled with consensual, hard-core and steamy sex, though that does sound incredibly pleasurable. Instead, it will be devoted to hard and long days filled with development/construction and since academics and businesses will be lost, there will be a mandatory need to replace these valued essentials. The most prestigious of our species will be the ones to complete the steps required for replacing our lost ways of life. I often think about changing my degree to architecture due to the fact that when the end of the world comes, if a shred of society is left, there will be three work-forces still in effect. The first is medical professions or those who pertain such knowledge, which will always be needed and around. The second being government or a sense of law/police, because someone will always rise to lead/control a group of people. Humans are susceptible to power-hungry frames of mind. The third would be my area of study, development. When our world remains in ruins, humans will persevere to reconstruct the closest thing to a utopia that will accommodate any and all necessities. You are totally right when you say the cycle will repeat, however. If there is one thing I have taken away from my Social-Studies classes it is that history will repeat itself. That is why it is necessary to study history. I believe that our society should come to an end. I shall survive because I am quite a ruthless little lady. The idea of being surrounded by like-minded people is what I personal consider to be “quality of life”. Something that is hard for me to reach. Luckily, I have you guys over here at Chimpout to keep me sane and alert!

Humanity will always go on. Mammals have been around for millions of years and have adapted and survived to bring us about. This trend will continue. However the perils of the cyclical empire are ones we should be prepared for. While I may sound like a hypocrite I do believe part of that preparation is to have children. It is for me, as perhaps it is for you, a misconception about the most important things in life. I've held dear my philosophical and cultural leanings and perhaps put too much emphasis on them over parenthood. Finding the right mate has proven nigh impossible but we shouldn't let such things compromise our goals. As much as I hate to say it, I've let that attitude defeat me far too long.

Part of our effort is to gain numbers and influence in the media and Academia. It is harder to do that with nieces and nephews. Raising children with the right beliefs will get us closer but I do understand the dilemma of the Animal Farm. Perhaps the timing isn't the best? I suppose I feel the same way.

[mister ape hands]

While watching the CityTV news here in Canada, they ran a story that asked whether or not IQ tests are a "myth". The anchor said, "a new finding may crush people's ego about their high IQs". So, they briefly talked about it, and the conclusion? There was no easy way to test IQ. Nothing about the IQ differences between the races that is incredibly well documented. They did talk about SAT tests, but they did not mention who did better on it or why.

Such is the case of the difference deniers. By saying that IQ differences do not exist or that there is no way to accurately test IQ - they have made this argument in the best; it stands on thin stilts - and that IQ tests are next to meaningless. By denying IQ, the excuses for the absolute failure of the nigger species is that it is because of YT oppression. Here in Canada, our large immigrant community often uses this excuse, and as such, schools in the Greater Toronto Area have to have their test standards lowered to accommodate the lower IQs. As such, Toronto schools are seen as some of the worst schools. They are not as bad as Detroit schools, mind you, but it's a pattern seen in formerly white areas such as Britain, Australia, and Canada: by lowering standards and neglecting the best and brightest in favour of the dummies, you encourage laziness and favour those who would otherwise destroy society. Societies that have done this in the past, such as India and Persia, once white, have suffered immensely for it by inbreeding. In this case we are offending those who are bright, by saying: "Yeah, you're smart, but we don't care because we've got niggers here that we need to take care of."

I have often pondered whether or not we as a species have grown dumber. By doing some more research, I have found that interbreeding with less-intelligent species, such as coalburning and oil-drilling, eventually lower the mean IQ over a long period of time. IQ is not the only thing affected; the overall health of the gene pool suffers as a result.

However, the fact that the medical profession still vehemently denies the existence of IQ in the same fashion as they deny differences between men and women forces us to ask this question: why is something so easy to tell not encouraged? Science has become heavily politicized, with the fields most affected psychology, climatology, physics (sadly), and the (I call it this) pseudo-science sociology. Overall the public has been turned off of science, and I have heard and read stories of science departments closing in Britain. Why is this so? With Affirmative Action quotas, they have neglected the best and brightest and instead include people that would otherwise be shunned in a truly just society. Science has become too "hard" for them.

With science so politicized, it is hard to speak the truth about things, because the truth, whether scientific, or if you're religious, religious, is tossed aside for fear of not offending someone. Offense is the last thing we should be concerned about, because the truth is at its core very destructive, but it overall serves a higher purpose. Society exists for the benefit of the people, not the people for its benefit. But with a culture of "I WANT, so I WILL have!" society must be changed to suit the purposes of the minority rather than the majority. In the '60's, where this nonsense began its traction, the young, radical activists were despised by the "silent majority". 50 years later and the young still are the activists, albeit in fewer numbers due to the fizzling of the population bomb. Nonetheless their cries are twice as loud for social change.

And this social change includes the denial of difference between the races. It is well known that IQ DOES exist, and it does not simply mean having mathematical knowledge: it includes knowledge across all different fields. The primary thing with IQ is that the user has a creative and logistic view of the world and wishes to change it in a way that works. Those with low IQs cannot comprehend the world properly, and as such, tend to live in a child-like interpretation of it, which explains the child-like behaviour of niggers. IQ is genetic and often highly intelligent people do not breed as much as the lower-IQ ones do. In our times, this is unfortunate, as the most intelligent people with the highest IQs have the lowest birthrates in the world. Asia, with the exception of the Philippines, has lower TFRs than Europe. In the long run, our species will gradually degrade.

Science via technology has made immense progress, but in the field of testing theories it has stagnated, because of Affirmative Action quotas. Feminists and the NAACP have made it clear that minorities MUST be in a field regardless of their intelligence or capability. In the military, such quotas have left it in shambles. Without a military strong in intelligence and morality, your country will be left open to attack, both internally and externally.

So we witness another repeat of history. Our culture is what the Germans would call a "kultur-kampf" (hope that is spelled correctly), a counter-culture where a degenerate and naturally superior culture focused on the whole are at war. On one side, we have the traditionalists, who are for the overall health of the society, and what I call the inferiors: those who wish to bend the rules to support minorities that would otherwise slice their neck while they sleep. If one prevails, the society becomes backwards. If both exist, there is an internal war both inside the country and in the hearts of the people.

Liberalism is a plague, but it is a self-defeating one. It will eventually eat away at itself before it can fully go to work. That said, the young activists, more infatuated with the idea of being an icon in this world of so-called "oppression", use emotion, not reason, and in that sense they are not for the truth whatsoever. Their insanity is based off of rebellion to the "shackles" of tradition. They want a world of equality for all, while denying that our very make-up and thoughts make that idea, let alone reality, impossible.

Faced with that fact, they force scientific institutions to prevent studies showing that there are IQ differences. They deny that there are any differences at all; we are all one in the same, they say. They even take Darwin's work and turn it into a social movement. People on either side of the conflict have been brainwashed to believe that we are all one in the same, whether in the classroom, the Church, and even in the home.

With the closing of the public mind, and the curious mind overall, the idea that we can all live in harmony prevails over logic. As such, the question of why Africa is so backwards compared to YT civilizations is replied with: "Because of the white man's oppression" rather than the obvious: their below-retardation IQs.

This is the result of the counter-culture. By denying even the reality of difference, we put our children and ourselves at risks. One must only look at the higher proportion of rapes and crimes done by niggers and realize how much they are a threat overall. Strangely, on posters of how to prevent rape you see pictures of white males. Why is this so? Because the truth is racist. Such a crime, telling the truth, eh?

While the scientific community is drowning in corruption and the schools drown in depths of activism, it is more important than ever to consider common sense. With difference deniers, everything for the sake of good gets turned into the sake of equality. When equality becomes more important than truth, it is more important than ever to stay strong and speak up. However, it is important to be clever. Cleverness will be a great asset in the long run.

And that, fellow comrades, is my little tirade.

The news site is here: http://www.citynews.ca/news/

Wow! Thank you for that. That was very refreshing and inspired me in many ways. I saved your tirade and want to repeat it all over the place. Extremely well written and articulate. The clarity and truthfullness of your writing is superb!