"Going Rogue".....

[skillet]

I'm actually surprised that I'm the first Chimpion to start a thread on this topic....

I received "Going Rogue" for Christmas...I must say, it didn't disappoint. The ONLY thing that would disappoint would be if it came to light that Sarah had someone else write the book.....


This book...well...I believe, was written from the heart. Also, for those who deem Sarah an idiot, please read this book. You can't judge her fairly without reading this book. As for me, I would donate anything I could immediately to help get this woman elected in 2012. She IS NOT stupid; far from it. Just look at her record as governor.....

Why is the left so afraid of her? Maybe because she is everything she claims to be.

Look at her record as governor and decide for yourself.

Palin 2012:rockthumbsup

[Intolerant]

The Left fears her like a crucifix...nuff said.

[James_E_Ray]

The only thing I have (or should I say, 'had') against Palin is that we really never knew shit about her and nobody was willing to analyze her honestly. Not that it really mattered, she was only running for VICE president and in all reality, the VP really doesn't do jack shit. She probably would have had more influence if she wound up to be the First Lady but I digress...

In the last election, she was held up against a filthy nigger, a turncoat, RINO imbecile and a pathetic closet liberal of a sitting president so of course she looked stellar in comparison. But then again, a trained monkey would have looked good too against that backdrop, which leads to my next point...

The only reasons I heard to vote for Sarah Palin John McCain were as follows;

-- It's not Osambo
-- She's McCain is at least White
-- ZOMG SHE'S A WOMAN!!
-- She claims to be conservative
-- She's Hot :jerk
-- Oops* Who was running for President again?

Again, let's not forget that SHE WASN'T RUNNING FOR JACK SHIT. John McCain was the one running for president, and although he would have been better than Osambo, IMO he wouldn't have been all that much better. Not to mention, as luck would have it, the old geezer probably wouldn't have tipped over in the next 4 years anyway.

As far as future elections go, (to say the least) I am not sold on electing a woman for the sake of electing a woman. To me, it seems that's a big part of the reason we ended up with an incompetent (as if there is any other kind) nigger this time around. Have we learned NOTHING from recent history?

I don't mean to say I would never vote for Sarah Palin if she were to run for something in the future. I just mean I don't know... I really don't know...

[skillet]

The only thing I have (or should I say, 'had') against Palin is that we really never knew shit about her and nobody was willing to analyze her honestly. Not that it really mattered, she was only running for VICE president and in all reality, the VP really doesn't do jack shit. She probably would have had more influence if she wound up to be the First Lady but I digress...

In the last election, she was held up against a filthy nigger, a turncoat, RINO imbecile and a pathetic closet liberal of a sitting president so of course she looked stellar in comparison. But then again, a trained monkey would have looked good too against that backdrop, which leads to my next point...

The only reasons I heard to vote for Sarah Palin John McCain were as follows;

-- It's not Osambo
-- She's McCain is at least White
-- ZOMG SHE'S A WOMAN!!
-- She claims to be conservative
-- She's Hot :jerk
-- Oops* Who was running for President again?

Again, let's not forget that SHE WASN'T RUNNING FOR JACK SHIT. John McCain was the one running for president, and although he would have been better than Osambo, IMO he wouldn't have been all that much better. Not to mention, as luck would have it, the old geezer probably wouldn't have tipped over in the next 4 years anyway.

As far as future elections go, (to say the least) I am not sold on electing a woman for the sake of electing a woman. To me, it seems that's a big part of the reason we ended up with an incompetent (as if there is any other kind) nigger this time around. Have we learned NOTHING from recent history?

I don't mean to say I would never vote for Sarah Palin if she were to run for something in the future. I just mean I don't know... I really don't know...

Eloquently stated, as always, JER, but, if she looked like Margaret Thatcher, would she have more credibility? *just throwing it out there as a possibility*

I have just one comment to refute the "we know nothing about her" argument.......
Barack Hussein Obama-cheers

[James_E_Ray]

Eloquently stated, as always, JER, but, if she looked like Margaret Thatcher, would she have more credibility? *just throwing it out there as a possibility*


Nope.

If she had a long track record of 'heartless' conservatism, she would have credibility. If she had repeatedly demonstrated in the past that she was able to say 'NO' to seemingly compassionate measures to 'help the poor' (niggers), either because she was against freeloading or because it was not fiscally responsible to do so, that would add to her credibility. If she lived her life as a true conservative and not as an independent 'career woman', that would add to her credibility. (but of course we wouldn't be talking about her then). If she was willing to go to bat against powerful liberal lobby groups and fight for tort reform... if she was willing to take the pressure to end affirmative action... if she would fight to repeal the Gun Control Act of 1968... if she would end 'deficit spending'... etc... etc... and perhaps the most important of all; if she was willing to fight congress, tooth and nail, and force them to abide by the US Constitution - particularly the 10th amendment - she would have credibility.

But we don't know any of these things. Therefore, her credibility is questioned... as it should be.

But she is hot though... :lol

[CoonTownYT]

Tell us how you really feel, JJ! :lol

I agree, though. The more research I do on her, the more she seems like a very Bush-like neo-con.

[Stinkynigs]

Nope.

If she had a long track record of 'heartless' conservatism, she would have credibility. If she had repeatedly demonstrated in the past that she was able to say 'NO' to seemingly compassionate measures to 'help the poor' (niggers), either because she was against freeloading or because it was not fiscally responsible to do so, that would add to her credibility. If she lived her life as a true conservative and not as an independent 'career woman', that would add to her credibility. (but of course we wouldn't be talking about her then). If she was willing to go to bat against powerful liberal lobby groups and fight for tort reform... if she was willing to take the pressure to end affirmative action... if she would fight to repeal the Gun Control Act of 1968... if she would end 'deficit spending'... etc... etc... and perhaps the most important of all; if she was willing to fight congress, tooth and nail, and force them to abide by the US Constitution - particularly the 10th amendment - she would have credibility.

But we don't know any of these things. Therefore, her credibility is questioned... as it should be.

But she is hot though... :lol

If only we could have ANYONE with that kind of balls, literally or figuratively....


:picard

[Stinkynigs]

That said, I wholeheartedly support her bid for President in 2012. She would do just as much (maybe more) as BHO to drive the US towards cataclysm and revolution - a good thing.

Yep, giving DC the big flush would definitely be a good day indeed.

http://www.chimpout.com/forum/imagehosting/32654b3edf41ba822.jpg

[Claire]

The Left fears her like a crucifix...nuff said.

She's a feminist hunter who can easily take them down and she doesn't believe in giving entitlements to niggers.

We should be behind her 100%

[Gallóglaigh]

In the UK we have a show where politicians sit down, 1 on 1, no notes, teleprompters or anything else, and get grilled for an hour on live TV. Palin would be reduced to an utter shambles in a such a format. In the UK, her career would then be over. In the US, it would prompt yet another round of predictable sniveling about how this rugged frontierswoman is, yet once again, just a poor widdle victim of the wascally wiberal media.


So then please explain to us "stupid americans" why the UK is totally under the control of Socialist liberal asshats, when you have such a fair and open way of interrogating,er, interviewing candidates?

[Gallóglaigh]

Doesn't that apply to us as well?

Not yet.

"Yet" being the key word.

[Stinkynigs]

I don't think American's are stupid. Except for the niggers, they are no more or less intelligent than the population of any other country.

As far as the UK being under the control of socialist asshats and how it relates to our political programming, intelligence, eloquence, and the ability to think quickly on ones feet do not necessarily equal wisdom.

Stephen Jay Gould, for example, was an extremely intelligent super-libtard who put himself through ludicrous intellectual convolutions in his book "The Mismeasure of Man" in order to maintain his belief in racial equalitarianism.

My point about Palin is that while the qualities I mentioned above do not necessarily equal wisdom, they are helpful in its attainment and are absolutely necessary for someone who wants to run the most powerful country in the free world. Palin posesses none of them.

To be fair, those traits are a great asset when dealing with diplomacy, and in that regard I can see world leaders taking on the air of "She's a nice lady, but...." when describing her. Per American politics, on the other hand, intelligence and eloquence mainly should only need to rest upon (and I stress SHOULD) the understanding of the Constitution and the ability to convey your policies based on those measures to the people. I understand, I'm a purist, and this currently is not the model, and yet those very people whom one would assume to be the most armed in these fields, our so-called Ivy League potentates, are the very ones who got us into this wonderful little mess, the same mess in which future courses of action I foresee include such heart-warming and fuzzy stories to share with grandchildren such as secession, civil war, general strife, hunger...and other such wonderful gifts from our upper crust. Guidance by the Constitution does not necessarily require quickness on one's feet, as it's all boxed up nice and neat, unless we're discussing the current regime's sprint to destroy said Constitutional boundaries and how to combat them.

So, to wrap things up, I sit the fence with her because while I don't want to fall into the "she's just like me" crowd, a stupid way to measure a leader, I do however see in her a real conviction to be subject to and dispense law according to the confines of the Constitution, as was intended for any so-called "leader" here. Would she be willing to go so far as to enact the massive overhauls that are necessary to really get this boat righted? I don't know. I somewhat lean to the no. She needs time to grow in my opinion. Stupid she is not, however. Just naive. For one I doubt she ever expected just how vicious the left really is.

[Zorro]

Why is the left so afraid of her?

Libtard women are threatened by an attractive, fit woman who has a successful career and happy home life. Sarah has it all and they are quite envious.

:witch

[Arnold_Swatanigger]

Nope.

If she had a long track record of 'heartless' conservatism, she would have credibility. If she had repeatedly demonstrated in the past that she was able to say 'NO' to seemingly compassionate measures to 'help the poor' (niggers), either because she was against freeloading or because it was not fiscally responsible to do so, that would add to her credibility. If she lived her life as a true conservative and not as an independent 'career woman', that would add to her credibility. (but of course we wouldn't be talking about her then). If she was willing to go to bat against powerful liberal lobby groups and fight for tort reform... if she was willing to take the pressure to end affirmative action... if she would fight to repeal the Gun Control Act of 1968... if she would end 'deficit spending'... etc... etc... and perhaps the most important of all; if she was willing to fight congress, tooth and nail, and force them to abide by the US Constitution - particularly the 10th amendment - she would have credibility.

But we don't know any of these things. Therefore, her credibility is questioned... as it should be.

But she is hot though... :lol

Anyone with those qualifications would never be remotely considered by either party, they would actually try to associate such a person to the opposing party to show how evil, ignorant, intolerant, or other buzz words for not a progressive. It will take a revolution of some sort to unfuck this country, armed or political, I'm ready for it.

[Whitey Ford]

http://i45.tinypic.com/r6z29k.jpg

[Tom]

Sarah "nigger lover" Palin is a neocon theocrat warmonger who can go suck Obama's cock.:first

[skillet]

Sarah "nigger lover" Palin is a neocon theocrat warmonger who can go suck Obama's cock.:first

How is Sarah Palin a nigger lover? Could you please provide links, Tom? Glenn Beck certainly seems to be based on what he's been airing on his show, but I've never seen any indication that Sarah Palin is one.

Please cite sources.

[seepy jeebus]

I Never Thought She was Stupid.
Compared to 'Whom'?

She's not running for anything, yet the pitchfork and torches crowd are always up and running.

[DuhWanda]

I don't think American's are stupid. Except for the niggers, they are no more or less intelligent than the population of any other country.

As far as the UK being under the control of socialist asshats and how it relates to our political programming, intelligence, eloquence, and the ability to think quickly on ones feet do not necessarily equal wisdom.

Stephen Jay Gould, for example, was an extremely intelligent super-libtard who put himself through ludicrous intellectual convolutions in his book "The Mismeasure of Man" in order to maintain his belief in racial equalitarianism.

My point about Palin is that while the qualities I mentioned above do not necessarily equal wisdom, they are helpful in its attainment and are absolutely necessary for someone who wants to run the most powerful country in the free world. Palin posesses none of them.

Oh, geez... I've been holding my breath for months waiting for the "Stupid fat American's [sic] LOL" crowd to show up. On what evidence are you basing your assertion that Palin is 'stupid,' Jenkem?

Grrr... I think as humans we need to be in this together, across our national/continental borders, and not let ourselves become pawns of our respective nations' media machines and the eerily similar propaganda they spin out. I also think critics of Palin are taking advantage of latent "Gee, she looks like a stewardess; she can't be that smart"-type sexism that lurks in the heart of almost everyone (women included) of any political persuasion.

I'm a libertarian, and I do agree that Palin shows some disturbing neo-con traits (I do wonder how much of this is authentically her, though, vs. what she thinks she needs to do/say to get ahead). That said, I've seen no evidence that leads me to believe she's 'stupid.'

Ok, I've (sort of) had my say, so I'm going to duck out of this little mini-argument now. :)

[Black Plague]

The million dollar question with Palin is what she thinks about niggers. I've heard mixed reports. Probably just liberals trying to make her out to be 'racist', but still there must be politicians out there that hate niggers. Unfortunately too many 'conservatives' are infected with the modern day liberal version of Christianity that says niggers are our equal, but yet we have to treat them special and send money and aid to the african toilet even though they're our equal because deep down, we know they're really not our equal.

[S.T.P]

So then please explain to us "stupid americans" why the UK is totally under the control of Socialist liberal asshats, when you have such a fair and open way of interrogating,er, interviewing candidates?

Exactly!!!!.

The US isn't about to become a Muslim country with the blessings of its socialist liberal government. We keep our weapons too!

This thread shouldn't turn into a flame war, but dont tread on us when your own house is in a shambles.

[haywood]

Oh, geez... I've been holding my breath for months waiting for the "Stupid fat American's [sic] LOL" crowd to show up. On what evidence are you basing your assertion that Palin is 'stupid,' Jenkem?

Grrr... I think as humans we need to be in this together, across our national/continental borders, and not let ourselves become pawns of our respective nations' media machines and the eerily similar propaganda they spin out. I also think critics of Palin are taking advantage of latent "Gee, she looks like a stewardess; she can't be that smart"-type sexism that lurks in the heart of almost everyone (women included) of any political persuasion.

I'm a libertarian, and I do agree that Palin shows some disturbing neo-con traits (I do wonder how much of this is authentically her, though, vs. what she thinks she needs to do/say to get ahead). That said, I've seen no evidence that leads me to believe she's 'stupid.'

Ok, I've (sort of) had my say, so I'm going to duck out of this little mini-argument now. :)

I don't think that she's stupid either! I still want to f@#k her, though!:darwinthumbsup

[Calabrese]

I think most people like what Sarah Palin represents, that on the surface she shows something that we all hold as ideal. Pro 2nd amendment/hunter, family woman and self-made person. She really came off as a honest "God & Country" type of person when first presented to the electorate. Which I do think scared the shit out of the liberal establishment.

But when it comes to the nuance, there is just nothing there. There were no "gotcha" questions during that Couric interview. She's just a common sense person, who in my opinion probably doesn't have a real 'philosophy' or intellectual curiousity past anything that is right in front of her. I highly doubt she knows much about the Constitution, Supreme Court decisions or has read any of the freemarket economic books by Hayek, Mises etc. to qualify her as a Libertarian, in the same vein as Ron Paul.

Theres plenty of people that i know who cant stand niggers that voted for Obama because of McCains decision to have her as VP. Im telling ya, if the right in this country wants 4 more years of Obamas bullshit, they'll run her...though I doubt she'll run. Johnny is right, she would be put to best use as a populist rabble-rouser for whomever runs for the Republicans in '12.