Maslow's Hierarchy and Niggers - A Psychological Observation

[Euro-Mongoloid Ape Hunter]

Though niggers are not human, I have pondered a close similarity between niggers and hmans when looking at the big picture, as far as physiological and psychological needs in life. I thought to myself in BUS110 one year ago when I was taking the course, how niggers are so different from humans in many ways, yet from a grand psychological perspective, so much is the same. Like I said, I acknowledge niggers are truly so different, that they cannot function in what we call civilized society, but they seek every need under Maslow's Hierarchy just like humans, in order to feel as a whole individual. Niggers, try as they may to mimick and seek human desires, do so in a way that is very dangerous and strange. I will explain in depth, and though I could, I will try not to make a book of it.
note: Use the attatched picture for reference if you are unfamiliar with Maslow's Hierarchy.

Basic Survival Needs:
Every creature needs nourishment, and niggers are certainly no exception. Fried chicken and pork testicles, though certainly unhealthy, fulfill this most primitive need of survival for niggers, as it is flushed down with gallons of grape Kool-Aid. Humans of some cultures find these appetizing as well, though niggers tend to take these foodstuffs to an excess. Agitated mothers also have a disturbing tendency to "ghetto lobster" their niglets when pushed over the limit.

Safety & Security:
Niggers are highly territorial creatures, with a strong sense of attatchment to what they consider their "turf." They will protect their person, property, and turf, with deadly force, using a vast array of human made (and illegal) weaponry, that they have appeared to learn how to use. Niggers are very dangerous, blood thirsty animals, no matter how timid at first some of the beta males may seem. After a day of fending off other nigger packs and unsuspecting humans, they feel safe when crashing for the night in their "cribs."

Feeling of Belonging:
In this category of Maslow's Hierarchy, as it relates to niggers, it is the most debated and discussed of all among scholars of Negro studies, and it is important to understand in order to know how and why niggers act the way they do. Bonding with the "homies" is extremely important to niggers, as is gangbanging to aquire new turf from other nigger packs or peaceful human neighborhoods. The alpha males of these nigger packs demand the utmost loyalty from the beta males, and any actions that compromise what humans consider criminal activity, embarass the pack, or is just seen as "f***ed" up by the alpha males, is dealt with harshy and fatally; There are no second chances when being around niggers, even when the "person" hanging around them is a nigger himself. Death is often a merciful fate for any unfortunate woman caught in the wrong area at the wrong time in niggerfuxated areas. A nigger who strays from the pack and tries to live a human existence, what we would call going to college and trying to make it, is seen by other nigger gangbangers as undesireable.

Esteem Needs:
In a stark difference from humans, what are the most primitive urges to human beings, are important to the ego of the negro male. While sexual urges satisfy the need to belong and a feeling of intimacy in humans, the sexual appendages and actions are important to a nigger's self esteem; My theory for this is the exponentially higher levels of testosterone in nigger males. Raping, "muh dik" episodes, and having the most "pimped out" cadillac in the hood are important to a nigger's feelings of self-worth, and this often leads to violent outbursts if a nigger does not get his way, endangering anything that moves and has a cavity, since any rejection makes the nigger feel like he has a charismatic or physical shortcoming, while most humans in a similiar situation would accept the rejection politely. Any self respecting sheboon would want to be "da mammy" of Tyrone's niglet, but only if he is the most well endowed and pimped out nigger in the hood. The sheboon usually figures Tyrone will stick around once it is time to spawn Jovan, hoping she will have a share of the cadillacs and blood money; Unfortunately for Lateesha, it rarely if ever happens that way.

Self-Actualization:
The top tier of a nigger's innermost dreams and desires, as well as goals ever since he was old enough to rob a liquor store - rap stars, pimps, "bakkabal playas," you name it. All niggers have something they can only dream of, and they try their damdest to accomplish it. Like humans, not all of a nigger's plans turn out perfectly, so they have to settle; When a nigger stops trying and settles, which is more often the case with them than with humans, it is usually an attempt at showing the ultimate loyalty to the homies, by dying for the gang in a gunbattle with police and DEA.

Enclosed is what I have dubbed the "Nigger's Hierarchy of Needs." Check it out and form your own opinion or theories, and add to it if you want. In the future, starting after exam week is over, I will post detailed observations of each section of Maslow's pyramid, and how niggers fulfill each section. Thank you for reading.

[blackmetal84]

Wow that was a great post. A great exposition on Maslow's structure as it relates to niggers. I downloaded the hierarchy and will add to it when I get the chance.

[Eve]

Yes, just an excellent post. :clap


http://static.keebali.com/arizonasportsfans.com/vb/images/smilies/koolaid.gif

[redleg112]

all i can say is wow a great, well thoughy out and researched post. i downloaded the zip and i will made a worth addition-i hope after i examine all the documents-great job and its to the point and lays out the truth:clap

[umberto]

Niggers can't reach self-actualization.

That requires a moral system.

[Clorox]

:potd

[RizzleMcDizzle]

Excellent post! :potd
Eventhough niggers do not warrant any sort of in-depth discussion, being a lover of psychology, I do so love any sort of psychological profiling and your analysis of the common negroid with relation to Maslow's hierarchy of needs was quite interesting and entertaining. It's always fun to know what makes niggers "tick". Keep up the good work! thumbsup

[umberto]

Niggers can actually go directly from basic needs to self-actualization. They don't need a moral system. Actually I think nigger self-actualization is tied directly into the fulfilment of basic needs.

Sorry, I have to argue that one. Fulfilling basic needs is about as far as most niggers go. Some might make it as far as meeting the esteem needs, in the way that you have defined it. However, to be self-actualized does require morals and ethics. So, at best the nigger version of Maslow's pyramid would necessarily be truncated.

Sorry to pull the "cut and paste" thing on you, but I found this and thought it was a good piece on self-actualization and is excerpted from Maslow himself, with references. (Sorry, to be nit-picking, but my first degree was psych/philo). Niggers simply can't reach such a state, even if you try to define it within their own terms. Self-actualization, in the shortest definition, is about no longer being concerned with affirming ones ego. It is a rare nigger than can honestly do that. Niggerball players and crappers are still entirely about self-gratification, which is the antithesis of self-actualization. As I hope you will agree, the nigger is incapable of any of the following.


Maslow on Self-Actualizing Persons


Maslow, on the basis of a study of persons (living and dead) selected as being self-actualizing persons on the basis of a general definition, described the self-actualizing person as follows, as compared to ordinary or average people (Maslow, 1956):

1. More efficient perception of reality and more comfortable relations with it. This characteristic includes the detection of the phoney and dishonest person and the accurate perception of what exists rather than a distortion of perception by one's needs. Self-actualizing people are more aware of their environment, both human and nonhuman. They are not afraid of the unknown and can tolerate the doubt, uncertainty, and tentativeness accompanying the perception of the new and unfamiliar. This is clearly the characteristic described by Combs and Snygg and Rogers as awareness of perceptions or openness to experience.

2. Acceptance of self, others, and nature. Self-actualizing persons are not ashamed or guilty about their human nature, with its shortcoming, imperfections, frailties, and weaknesses. Nor are they critical of these aspects of other people. They respect and esteem themselves and others. Moreover, they are honest, open, genuine, without pose or facade. They are not, however, self-satisfied but are concerned about discrepancies between what is and what might be or should be in themselves, others, and society. Again, these characteristics are those which Kelly, Rogers, and Combs and Snygg include in their descriptions.

3. Spontaneity. Self-actualizing persons are not hampered by convention, but they do not flout it. They are not conformists, but neither are they anti-conformist for the sake of being so. They are not externally motivated or even goal-directed- rather their motivation is the internal one of growth and development, the actualization of themselves and their potentialities. Rogers and Kelly both speak of growth, development and maturation, change and fluidity.


4. Problem-centering. Self-actualizing persons are not ego-centered but focus on problems outside themselves. They are mission-oriented, often on the basis of a sense of responsibility, duty, or obligation rather than personal choice. This characteristic would appear to be related to the security and lack of defensiveness leading to compassionateness emphasized by Combs and Snygg.

5. The quality of detachment; the need for privacy. The self-actualizing person enjoys solitude and privacy. It is possible for him to remain unruffled and undisturbed by what upsets others. He may even appear to be asocial. This is a characteristic that does not appear in other descriptions. It is perhaps related to a sense of security and self-sufficiency.

6. Autonomy, independence of culture and environment. Self-actualizing persons, though dependent on others for the satisfaction of the basic needs of love, safety, respect and belongingness, "are not dependent for their main satisfactions on the real world, or other people or culture or means-to-ends, or in general, on extrinsic satisfactions. Rather they are dependent for their own development and continued growth upon their own potentialities and latent resources." Combs and Snygg and Rogers include independence in their descriptions, and Rogers also speaks of an internal locus of control.

7. Continued freshness of appreciation. Self-actualizing persons repeatedly, though not continuously, experience awe, pleasure, and wonder in their everyday world.

8. The mystic experience, the oceanic feeling. In varying degrees and with varying frequencies, self-actualizing persons have experiences of ecstasy, awe, and wonder with feelings of limitless horizons opening up, followed by the conviction that the experience was important and had a carry-over into everyday life. This and the preceding characteristic appear to be related and to add something not in other descriptions, except perhaps as it may be included in the existential living of Rogers.

9. Gemeinschaftsgefuhl. Self-actualizing persons have a deep feeling of empathy, sympathy, or compassion for human beings in general. This feeling is, in a sense, unconditional in that it exists along with the recognition of the existence in others of negative qualities that provoke occasional anger, impatience, and disgust. Although empathy is not specifically listed by others (Combs and Snygg include compassion), it would seem to be implicit in other descriptions including acceptance and respect.

10. Interpersonal relations. Self-actualizing people deep interpersonal relations with others. They are selective, however, and their circle of friends may be small, usually consisting of other self-actualizing persons, but the capacity is there. They attract others to them as admirers or disciples. This characteristic, again, is at least implicit in the formulations of others.

11. The democratic character structure. The self-actualizing person does not discriminate on the basis of class, education, race, or color. He is humble in his recognition of what he knows in comparison with what could be known, and he is ready and willing to learn from anyone. He respects everyone as potential contributors to his knowledge, merely because they are human beings.

12. Means and ends. Self-actualizing persons are highly ethical. They clearly distinguish between means and ends and subordinate means to ends.

13. Philosophical, unhostile sense of humor. Although the self-actualizing persons studied by Maslow had a sense of humor, it was not of the ordinary type. Their sense of humor was the spontaneous, thoughtful type, intrinsic to the situation. Their humor did not involve hostility, superiority, or sarcasm. Many have noted that a sense of humor characterizes people who could be described as self-actualizing persons, though it is not mentioned by those cited here.

14. Creativeness. All of Maslow's subjects were judged to be creative, each in his own way. The creativity involved here is not special-talent creativeness. It is a creativeness potentially inherent in everyone but usually suffocated by acculturation. It is a fresh, naive, direct way of looking at things. Creativeness is a characteristic most would agree to as characterizing self-actualizing persons.

(From Patterson, C. H. The Therapeutic Relationship. Monterey, CA. 1985
Dr. C. H. Patterson


So, I would argue that the nigger Maslow's pyramid would contain all the steps, as you suggest, but would be flattened and lacking the pinnacle of self-actualization. That is reserved solely for humans.

[nutnice]

Great post, looks like we have another knowledgeable niggerologist among us! thumbsup

[american born]

That is a good observation of behavior displayed by the nigger. It's right up my alley. In boot camp we were trained about stunted development. It' deep psychology about ways to quickly find a weakness. My DI broke one of the guys in my squad in matter of minutes. Simple questions of childhood trama. It's an interragtion method. This kid was broken to tears in front of 32 guys on line not allowed to eye ball. People, all people had a tramatic experience as a child. Whether it is you'r first time you got you'r ass kicked or it's a divorce between parents. It's there you just have to find it. Size them and break them down. Niggers I run across are targets of people with this obsevation and I think you hit it on the head with this thread. Their's nothing behind those eyes. No surprise they were so easily enslaved. They are a target of oppurtunity. I can not be angry with the people who discovered a way to profit off an ignorrant animal. I don't feel sorry for niggers, if they had any heart they would have fought back. They didn't and thats why they are so angry with YT. They were stunted the first day they looked in the mirror. What a sub human. Let's just get the race war over with.

[niggermortis]

Excellent post! :potd
Eventhough niggers do not warrant any sort of in-depth discussion, being a lover of psychology, I do so love any sort of psychological profiling and your analysis of the common negroid with relation to Maslow's hierarchy of needs was quite interesting and entertaining. It's always fun to know what makes niggers "tick". Keep up the good work! thumbsup
Something about the words "tick" and "nigger" in the same sentence certainly gives me ideas....:think ........kaboom!!

:chaingun

[umberto]

It's very dubious to say that a starving artist can't reach self-actualization because he didn't follow a script by a humanistic psychologist.

It would be, but we aren't discussing artists. We are discussing niggers, a species incapable of personal transcendance.

Moreover, if we reject the validity of Maslow's heirarchy, then we also reject the validity of his conclusions, including that of self-actualization, so we still have not been abel to identify niggers that could reach that stage. Whether the heirarchy is generally valid is another debate. EM Ape Hunter's argument and comparison is based on accepting Maslow's theory. The question is whehter the nigger can reach all of the stages of the pyramid as a human could.

Therefore, we must, given that this is the core of debate, at least accept the validity of his general theory if we are going to argue whether niggers are capable of reaching the pinnacle of his heirarchy.

My stance is they can not reach self-actualization due to their inability to engage in moral or ethical conduct that goes beyond the procurement of the goods for basic survival or the maintenance of self-esteem. To grant this them this ability would to admit to there being legitimate nigger statesmen (for example) which have yet to be produced.

This is not to belittle Ape Hunter's work, I think it is spot on. However, I think the expectations for penultimate achievement of the nigger needs to be lowered, as usual.

[umberto]

Quite right. However, I don't think anybody doubts that there exists a state where an individual is happy and fulfilled - and I'm sure Maslow recognized that before coming up with the explanation for it. The question is whether his explanation correctly describes the process leading to this state. I don't think it does.It may for some, but clearly not for everybody. That does not mean that the state it describes doesn't exist.

No system can encompass all behaviors and explain them. It is merely a convenient framework for discussions such as this.


This is a bit like Chomsky's theory on language acquisition. When you look closer, his "theory" is only a black box labeled the "language acquisition device" and is totally worthless when it comes to explaining language acquisition.

I've never bought into to congnitive psychology for this reason. If it lacks imperical evidence, it's crap. That is why this is an entertaining philosphical discussion, but must remain academic. We'll never be able to test the thoery.


However, nobody denies that language exists even though Chomsky's theory is just vacuum with a name. Happyness and a feeling of achievement and fulfilment also exists regardless of Maslow's bogus pyramid. I'm only postulating that niggers don't need a complicated process of reinforcement (let's bring in some Skinner since we are on a roll) to do it. They go to that state directly from fulfilling base needs whereas humans need far more to become happy and satisfied.

Yes, but this level of satisfaction is then limted only to the fulfillment of basic needs and that of the ego. Therefore, it does not qualify as self-actualization. Satiation of hunger can be very fulfilling (no pun intended). It does not make one self-actualized if they limit themselves to such a mundane goal. It just means that the requirements for that person to have fullfilled their greatest potential is much lower. So, while few, other than nihilists, would deny that it is possible to feel happy and fulfilled, that happines and fulfillment means different things, depending on one's development, goals, and desires. That brings us back to my thesis the nigger is incapable of self-acutalization because satisfaction of the basic desires such as food, sex, dominating the pack (ego gratification) may represent fulfillment for the negro, as have been stated. However, I feel that this fulfillment can not represent self-actualization because of the missing moral development. The self-actualized person only engages in that selfishness that is required for personal maintenance and survival. Their concerns become ones that consider their effect on their surroundings. The nigger can not attain this level because they will always attempt to bolster their weak egos by attempting to assert dominance and define territory with out regard to the effects of their passage (as we have routinely established).


The fact that Maslow branded this realtively obvious phenomenon as "self-actualization" does not give him monopoly on it. His theory was about explaining how people reach this pinnacle of personal achievement, not to prove that it really exists. He always assumed it existed and never tried to explain it except under the framework of his system - which has the purpose of explaining why it happens. Even his descriptions of this phenomenon are vague, as is befitting of a voodoo psychologist like him.
One thing I forgot to mention. The state of self-actualization can't exist only within the framework of his theory. Every concept like that needs to be independently verifiable to be considered valid. If we have to drop the concept just because we reject the system concocted to explain it, it only means that the concept is totally relative and does not necessarily exist in the real world.

All theories are logical constructs that help us define the world about us. Falsifiability is one of the foundations of science. I agree that a concept like self-actualization must be practiced in the real world to be valid and therefore subject to experimental scrutiny. That is why I have always said that things like Maslow's theories belong more to the realm of philosophy than they do psychology. B.F. Skinner himself warned against this dilution of empiricism when the cognitivists appeared. Your remark "If we have to drop the concept just because we reject the system concocted to explain it, it only means that the concept is totally relative and does not necessarily exist in the real world," saves us from the pitter-patter of little logical- positivist feet (a baleful sound if ever there was.)

[umberto]

OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT:

The preceding debate concerning the philosphy of human development contained elements of dehumian philosphy and the controversy between the behaviorist and cognitive perpsectives in psychology. All this brought to you by the ignorant, toothless, backwards, uneducated, trailer-park dwelling rednecks of chimpout.com

:bat

[nutnice]

OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT:

The preceding debate concerning the philosphy of human development contained elements of dehumian philosphy and the controversy between the behaviorist and cognitive perpsectives in psychology. All this brought to you by the ignorant, toothless, backwards, uneducated, trailer-park dwelling rednecks of chimpout.com

:bat

yah srsly peeple on dis forum r such dumm rednecks :lol

BTW, how long do you think a nigger would've made it reading the above discussion
before saying "Maing i dunno wat dese mofuggers be tawkin bout" and just giving up?
I say two sentences.

[Koon_Hunter]

Niggers are the only animal that can breed with a human.

[umberto]

yah srsly peeple on dis forum r such dumm rednecks :lol

BTW, how long do you think a nigger would've made it reading the above discussion
before saying "Maing i dunno wat dese mofuggers be tawkin bout" and just giving up?
I say two sentences.

No bet unless you give me a spread of minus 30 seconds.

[gnigs_r_skum]

Considering the dreck that Psychologists usually produce, this is a masterpiece. Niggers minds are so small and stupid that normal Psychology is irrelevant, like all niggers are retarded and crazy by human standards.
Niggers are incapable of anything more than crass, amoral, destructive egotism that benefits no one.:less

[Geek]

.....Their's nothing behind those eyes.

I have made this same observation to friends when discussing the nigger beast and its docile acceptance of slavery. When one of my less educated or insightful friends would ask, ‘why would we enslave a people,’ I would answer, ‘because they would be slaves.’ And this is the nut inside the shell of the nigger beast, they will be slaves…there is nothing behind their eyes, no morals, no soul, no expectation of life a life as we know it.

:obamatard