Origin of AIDS

[LaTrine Jakscoon]

Guys, I need your help here, I need info on how AIDS originated in Afreaka, either through niggers eating chimps or muh dikking them or both. I need it to be referenced, and not from any conspiracy site or anything like that. In fact, if its from somewhere official and nigger-friendly, that would be great! :geek

I've got plenty of statistics, I just need something a bit meatier :lol

[BananaTreeClimber]

Using HIV-1 gene sequences recovered from archival samples from some of the earliest known Haitian AIDS patients, we find that subtype B likely moved from Africa to Haiti in or around 1966 (1962–1970) and then spread there for some years before successfully dispersing elsewhere.

As far as them fucking monkeys, and/or eating monkeys, was probably a bit of both. God only knows how the niggers spread it in Haiti. They know it came from primates in Africa, how the niggers managed to catch it we can probably only imagine.

[LaTrine Jakscoon]

Using HIV-1 gene sequences recovered from archival samples from some of the earliest known Haitian AIDS patients, we find that subtype B likely moved from Africa to Haiti in or around 1966 (1962–1970) and then spread there for some years before successfully dispersing elsewhere.

As far as them fucking monkeys, and/or eating monkeys, was probably a bit of both. God only knows how the niggers spread it in Haiti.

That sounds interesting...do you have a link please?

[Ron Paul Supporter]

:gorilla:gorilla
Guys, I need your help here, I need info on how AIDS originated in Afreaka, either through niggers eating chimps or muh dikking them or both. I need it to be referenced, and not from any conspiracy site or anything like that. In fact, if its from somewhere official and nigger-friendly, that would be great! :geek

I've got plenty of statistics, I just need something a bit meatier :lol

Sorry, dude... The only thing you're gonna get from our present-day liberal world is simply that SIV mutated into HIV when it "jumped" from Chimpanzees to "Humans" in Africa somewhere between 100 and 80 years ago.

Of course, by their lack of detail you damn well know it came from fucking them!

I just hope they didn't delute the gene pool of the far superior chimpanzee!

[BananaTreeClimber]

http://www.pnas.org/content/104/47/18566 for where I grabbed that. Got to it through AIDS wiki. Kind of hard to find orgins, wonder why. I remember hearing long ago that they know it originated in primates, but whuddya know, niggers count as primates don't they?

Here is some mo material for you...
http://www.avert.org/origins.htm

"In February 1999 a group of researchers from the University of Alabama1 announced that they had found a type of SIVcpz that was almost identical to HIV-1. This particular strain was identified in a frozen sample taken from a captive member of the sub-group of chimpanzees known as Pan troglodytes troglodytes (P. t. troglodytes), which were once common in west-central Africa.

The researchers (led by Paul Sharp of Nottingham University and Beatrice Hahn of the University of Alabama) made the discovery during the course of a 10-year long study into the origins of the virus. They claimed that this sample proved that chimpanzees were the source of HIV-1, and that the virus had at some point crossed species from chimps to humans.

Their final findings were published two years later in Nature magazine2. In this article, they concluded that wild chimps had been infected simultaneously with two different simian immunodeficiency viruses which had "viral sex" to form a third virus that could be passed on to other chimps and, more significantly, was capable of infecting humans and causing AIDS.

These two different viruses were traced back to a SIV that infected red-capped mangabeys and one found in greater spot-nosed monkeys. They believe that the hybridisation took place inside chimps that had become infected with both strains of SIV after they hunted and killed the two smaller species of monkey. "

Now the million dollar question still goes back to, so how did the first nigger get AIDS. Theories sound like the hunter/gatherer skill came into play. Hunt da monkey, eat da monkey. But c'mon, you know it was prolly muh dik muh dik muh dik, probably with a dead infected monkey nonetheless. Hope it helps, just takes some digging but you'll never find an answer to this question. Those darkeys are so far in the stone age the western world didn't know about it before it was too late to even find the coons that started it. Now we're all paying to try and clean up Africa yay.

[Holychinese]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081001/ap_on_he_me/sci_aids_virus_origin

latest.

[BananaTreeClimber]

Nevermind, the nigger answer must be correct...

From natural theories trying to answer the question, where did AIDS come from, focus should now be given to conspiracy theories. Like HIV was developed as a biological weapon to wipe out the black race or for population control

Don't they know by now that if we wanted them wiped out, we wouldn't fuck it up. If that's true someone needs to be fired for doing a piss poor job.

[Ravenwood]

Since AIDS only spreads through sexual contact or sharing infected needles, I don't think the niggers were shooting drugs with the chimpanzees. :nelson

[NAACPtookmybabyaway]

HIV jumped species from SIV (simian immunodeficiency virus), due to the nature of transmission it is far more likely to have come from sexual contact than ingestion (pure blood-blood contact rather than going through stomach lining etc).

[Niggerless Parsons]

Guys, I need your help here, I need info on how AIDS originated in Afreaka, either through niggers eating chimps or muh dikking them or both. I need it to be referenced, and not from any conspiracy site or anything like that. In fact, if its from somewhere official and nigger-friendly, that would be great! :geek

I've got plenty of statistics, I just need something a bit meatier :lol

Hi Hekate
You really must see this series through if you are interested in this. I believe it. Scientists are responsible.It was not intentional.


http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Ml7q6iMwqLY

[umberto]

That is the most commonly cited hypothesis and is accepted by many researchers. However, there is another that is very interesting. It was covered in National Geographic and on the PBS show "Frontline" some years ago (sorry, I don't have the reference, but I remember the issue)

The hypothesis is that it mutated from attempts to create a hepatitus B vaccine. Immmunoglobulins from Green Monkey kidneys were used for the vaccine. The serum contained the SIV virus, which then mutated into HIV.

I find this hypothesis very plausible because the trials of the vaccine coincide with the appearance of AIDS among gay males in N.Y and San Francisco. The trials occurred in the late 1970s in those areas. What came to be known as AIDS appeared in the U.S. among gay males in NY and SF in 1981, although later research on stored sample discovered that the virus could be found even closer to the period of the testing of the vaccine.

Also, keep in mind that there is support in the medical community for the idea that the SIV - HIV mutations may have arisen in several locales, so either or both hypotheses may be correct.

http://www.originofaids.com/

The reason I am uncomfortable with the "Monkey Meat" hypothesis is that bushmeat has been a traditional source of food for centuries. I find the idea of sudden mutation without some help a little difficult. With the Hep B hyposthesis, you have causality, correlation in time frame, correlation inthe use of the vaccine and later development of the diseaes in the vaccine recipients, mechanical transfer of viable cells between hosts, and traceability back to those trials. These are all things that are not available with the bush meat theory.

[Kavita]

Check this out
http://www.heretical.com/miscella/aids.html

"SIR – I have been waiting for an authoritative comment on the article by Roger Highfield and Charles Clover (Science, Feb. 1) suggesting that Aids began as a result of people in Central Africa eating certain chimpanzees. As none has been forthcoming, your readers – and perhaps the medical profession – might like to know of my own experience.

In 1957, as a student nurse, I was working at the Fever Hospital in Johannesburg. Patients were sent to us from all over Africa. Few could speak English, so could not describe their symptoms in detail or tell us how they might have contracted their particular illness.

I remember clearly the first patient who came in with very odd sores. A lot of tests were done – saliva, tears, blood, etc. – but we could not identify his problem, and he died. Suddenly there was a spate of similar cases, all from Central Africa and all ending in the patient's death. The hospital asked a mission station in the Belgian Congo (as it then was) to send someone down to tell us more about their lifestyle and what they ate.

We were told that in the Congo there was an endearing little monkey, grey but with a green sheen to its coat. While other chimps and monkeys were hunted and eaten – as they still are all over Africa – these were adopted as pets and even venerated, as people believed that the green sheen had mystic powers. Despite this veneration (or perhaps because of it), I was taken aback to learn that men copulated with them, some apparently picking up some sort of virus as a result.

When we realised that we did not know how to cure these very ill men, we decided there was no point in admitting any more. They simply stayed at home and died. We called it green monkey disease; some time later our professor, Jock Gear, said he was sure they were the first cases of Aids to come to official notice.

One question remains to be answered. Presumably humans had had sexual relations with these monkeys for a very long time. So why was it only in the 1950s, and only in a relatively small area of Central Africa, that the monkeys contracted the virus, and passed it on? Where did they get it from?

Mrs POLLY KIRK
Millom, Cumbria




Letters to the Editor, London Daily Telegraph, May 17 1999 "

So it seems HIV has it's origins in nig bucks muh diking unfortunate monkeys. Since the monkeys were so much better looking than their sows, I cannot blame them.

[Undertow]

http://news.scotsman.com/health/How-scientists-tracked-down-.4697291.jp


WHEN Aids first struck an unsuspecting American population in 1981, no-one had a clue what caused this lethal new disease, or where it came from.
As the disease spread at an alarming rate, scientists hurried to identify the cause. Two years later, French scientists Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Luc Montagnier from the Pasteur Institute in Paris, isolated a virus, later called the human immunode
ADVERTISEMENT
ficiency virus – HIV – that proved to be the cause of Aids. And just last month, more than 20 years after the event, they were awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine for their monumental discovery.

By the time the French scientists identified HIV, thousands were suffering from Aids and, we now know, an epidemic of unprecedented magnitude was already under way in sub-Saharan Africa. But where did the virus come from? And when did it first infect humans?

HIV is very prone to mutation, meaning that it evolves rapidly – up to a million times faster than animal DNA. This allows the virus to foil attempts by the body's immune system to eliminate it. It also allows the virus to develop drug resistance, and has so far prevented us making an effective vaccine. But the mutations are useful for tracking the virus back to its roots. By following the trail of genetic changes HIV has accumulated over time, molecular detectives traced it to west-central Africa, pinning down its launch pad to Kinshasa (previously Léopoldville), capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo, where they found viruses with the greatest genetic diversity. Just one of these HIVs, carried by a single individual, jumped from Kinshasa to Haiti, and from there to the United States, thus spawning the pandemic in the US and Europe.

But where did the ancestral virus originally come from? For several years scientists searched for HIV-like viruses among captive African primates without success, but then a team headed by Beatrice Hahn at Alabama University found a chimpanzee (called Marilyn and trained for space flight by the US air force) of one particular subspecies, Pan troglodytes, the common chimpanzee, which carried a virus similar to HIV.



They suggested that HIV jumped from chimps to humans in Africa, perhaps during the bloody process of killing and butchering chimps for bush meat. To prove this they needed to isolate viruses from wild chimps, but these animals are reclusive, endangered and live in remote jungle areas, so taking blood samples was out of the question. Instead, scientists resorted to collecting chimp faeces from the forest floor at ten sites in south-east Cameroon known to be chimpanzee territory. After air-lifting some 600 samples to the US and analysing them for chimp subspecies as well as viruses, they pointed the finger unequivocally at chimpanzees in Cameroon as the origin of HIV.

Another part of HIV's complex history fell into place last month when a group of US scientists compared the genetic material of two HIVs rescued from human samples taken in Léopoldville and stored since 1959.

The differences between them showed that even 50 years ago, HIV had been around long enough to accumulate a substantial number of mutations, and dated HIV's transfer to humans to the beginning of the 20th century.